Time series / Model
Sundial (Timer 3.0)
- Organisation
- Tsinghua University (THUML)
- Family
- Timer · version Sundial (ICML 2025); HF release sundial-base-128m
- Released
- 2025-02-02 (arXiv v1 submission date, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00816 (HF repo thuml/sundial-base-128m created 2025-05-13))
- Checkpoints
- thuml/sundial-base-128m
- Weights
- Open · Apache-2.0
- Links
- PaperModel cardCode
Training data disclosure: Partial list
Level determined for 73% of benchmark cells.
- TestTest data seen0
- SeenSeen, split unclear6
- TrainTraining data seen0
- Related data seen0
- NoNot seen30
- ?Unknown13
“we collected substantial real-world time series from various domains such as finance, IoT, meteorology, and healthcare (Goldberger et al., 2000).”
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
Training corpora
-
TimeBench
· 12 sources · pre-training
Evidence that Sundial (Timer 3.0) uses it
“Key statistics of TimeBench, the pre-training dataset of Sundial.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 “which is pre-trained on TimeBench (**10^12** time points)”
raw.githubusercontent.com · readme · README intro · retrieved 2026-10-15 Contents of this corpus
-
Chronos (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
94B points; Ansari et al. (2024) -- the Chronos training data (corpus not given a shared id here).
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ECG · split: unknown
48B points; cited as (2000) = Goldberger et al. 2000 (PhysioNet); specific ECG databases not named.
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Finance (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
10.5B points; '(Ours)' -- in-house collection, not enumerated.
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
IoT (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
5.8B points; '(Ours)' -- in-house collection, not enumerated.
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
LOSTA (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
230B points; = LOTSA (Woo et al., 2024), shared corpus id 'lotsa' (misspelt 'LOSTA' in source).
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Synthetic · split: unknown
0.5B points (0.05%); generated following KernelSynth (Ansari et al., 2024).
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 3h · split: unknown
129B points; ERA5 reanalysis (2021 citation).
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA 12h · split: unknown
32B points; ERA5 at 12-hour frequency (written 'ERA 12h').
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 Daily · split: unknown
406B points (39.35%).
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 Weekly · split: unknown
58B points.
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 Monthly · split: unknown
13.5B points.
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 Quarterly · split: unknown
4.5B points.
Evidence
“Chronos ECG Finance IoT LOSTA Synthetic ERA5 3h ERA 12h ERA5 Daily ERA5 Weekly ERA5 Monthly ERA5 Quarterly”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 4 · retrieved 2026-10-15
-
Chronos (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
-
Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD)
· 32 sources (complete list) · pre-training
· homepage
Evidence that Sundial (Timer 3.0) uses it
“thuml/UTSD”
huggingface.co · model card · YAML metadata `datasets` · retrieved 2026-10-15 Contents of this corpus
-
London Smart Meters · split: unknown
Evidence
“London Smart Meters | 166.50M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Wind Farms · split: unknown
Evidence
“Wind Farms | 7.40M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Aus. Electricity Demand · split: unknown
Evidence
“Aus. Electricity Demand | 1.16M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
AustraliaRainfall · split: unknown
Evidence
“AustraliaRainfall | 11.54M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
BeijingPM25Quality · split: unknown
Evidence
“BeijingPM25Quality | 3.66M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
BenzeneConcentration · split: unknown
Evidence
“BenzeneConcentration | 16.34M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
IEEEPPG · split: unknown
Evidence
“IEEEPPG | 15.48M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
BIDMC32HR · split: unknown
Evidence
“BIDMC32HR | 63.59M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
TDBrain · split: unknown
Evidence
“TDBrain | 72.30M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
SensorData · split: unknown
Evidence
“SensorData | 165.4M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 Surface · split: unknown
HF card splits ERA5 into Surface/Pressure; Timer paper Table 2 lists a single 'ERA5*' row (96458.81M points, i.e. far larger than UTSD) -- UTSD holds only a subset.
Evidence
“ERA5 Surface | 58.44M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
ERA5 Pressure · split: unknown
HF card splits ERA5 into Surface/Pressure; Timer paper Table 2 lists a single 'ERA5*' row (96458.81M points, i.e. far larger than UTSD) -- UTSD holds only a subset.
Evidence
“ERA5 Pressure | 116.88M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Temperature Rain · split: unknown
Evidence
“Temperature Rain | 23.25M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Saugeen River Flow · split: unknown
Evidence
“Saugen River Flow | 0.02M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
KDD Cup 2018 · split: unknown
Evidence
“KDD Cup 2018 | 2.94M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
US Births · split: unknown
Evidence
“US Births | 0.00M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Sunspot · split: unknown
Evidence
“Sunspot | 0.07M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Pedestrian Counts · split: unknown
Evidence
“Pedestrian Counts | 3.13M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Web Traffic · split: unknown
Evidence
“Web Traffic | 116.49M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
China Air Quality · split: unknown
Marked with the UTSD asterisk in Timer paper Table 2 but absent from the HF UTSD card table.
Evidence
“C HINA A IR Q UALITY *”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 2 (asterisk = originally belongs to UTSD) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Beijing Air Quality · split: unknown
Marked with the UTSD asterisk in Timer paper Table 2 but absent from the HF UTSD card table.
Evidence
“B EIJING A IR Q UALITY *”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 2 (asterisk = originally belongs to UTSD) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Bitcoin · split: unknown
Marked with the UTSD asterisk in Timer paper Table 2 but absent from the HF UTSD card table.
Evidence
“B ITCOIN *”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A, Table 2 (asterisk = originally belongs to UTSD) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UEA 2018 multivariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“MotorImagery | 72.58M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “MotorImagery | 72.58M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UEA 2018 multivariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“SelfRegulationSCP1 | 3.02M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “SelfRegulationSCP1 | 3.02M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UEA 2018 multivariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“SelfRegulationSCP2 | 3.06M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “SelfRegulationSCP2 | 3.06M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UEA 2018 multivariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“AtrialFibrillation | 0.04M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “AtrialFibrillation | 0.04M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UEA 2018 multivariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“EigenWorms | 27.95M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “EigenWorms | 27.95M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UCR Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UCR 2018 univariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“PigArtPressure | 0.62M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “PigArtPressure | 0.62M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UCR Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UCR 2018 univariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“PigCVP | 0.62M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “PigCVP | 0.62M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UCR Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UCR 2018 univariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“Phoneme | 2.16M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Phoneme | 2.16M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UCR Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UCR 2018 univariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“StarLightCurves | 9.46M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “StarLightCurves | 9.46M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
UCR Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · split: unknown
Member dataset of the UCR 2018 univariate classification archive (only this one dataset, not the whole archive); the UTSD card cites [3] = The UCR Time Series Archive as source. Neither the card nor the Timer paper says whether TRAIN, TEST or both files were used (Timer only says each variate is split 9:1 into train/validation for pre-training), so split unknown. Timer/Timer-XL/Sundial do not evaluate classification, but any model pre-trained on UTSD has seen these series.
Evidence
“Worms | 0.23M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Worms | 0.23M”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description table (source column [3]) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
huggingface.co · dataset card · Dataset Description references · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 3 (pre-training strategy) · retrieved 2026-10-15
-
London Smart Meters · split: unknown
Declared exclusions
- Benchmark GIFT-Eval · entirely excluded
-
Dataset ETTm1 · entirely excluded
Evidence
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Dataset ETTm2 · entirely excluded
Evidence
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Dataset ETTh1 · entirely excluded
Evidence
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Dataset ETTh2 · entirely excluded
Evidence
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Dataset Electricity (ECL, 321 clients) · entirely excluded
Evidence
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
Dataset Weather (Jena, 2020; Autoformer) · entirely excluded
Evidence
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix A · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
Benchmark cells
GIFT-Eval
Not seen Jena Weather (GIFT-Eval) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen BizITObs - Application · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen BizITObs - Service · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen BizITObs - L2C · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Bitbrains - Fast Storage · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Bitbrains - rnd · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Restaurant (Recruit Restaurant Visitor Forecasting) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen ETT1 (GIFT-Eval) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen ETT2 (GIFT-Eval) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Loop Seattle (LibCity) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen SZ-Taxi (LibCity) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M_DENSE (LibCity) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Solar (LSTNet, 137 Alabama PV plants) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Hierarchical Sales (Mancuso et al., 2020) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M4 Yearly · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M4 Quarterly · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M4 Monthly · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M4 Weekly · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M4 Daily · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen M4 Hourly · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen Hospital · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen COVID Deaths · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Seen, split unclear US Births · the dataset was used; the source does not say which part (via Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD)); this contradicts a statement that the data was excluded
Evidence (4)
“thuml/UTSD”
“US Births | 0.00M”
“All evaluated datasets are excluded from the pre-training dataset.”
“we experiment on GIFT-Eval (Aksu et al., 2024) and FEV leaderboard (Ansari et al., 2024)”
Seen, split unclear Saugeen River Flow · the dataset was used; the source does not say which part (via Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD)); this contradicts a statement that the data was excluded
Evidence (4)
“thuml/UTSD”
“Saugen River Flow | 0.02M”
“All evaluated datasets are excluded from the pre-training dataset.”
“we experiment on GIFT-Eval (Aksu et al., 2024) and FEV leaderboard (Ansari et al., 2024)”
Seen, split unclear Temperature Rain · the dataset was used; the source does not say which part (via Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD)); this contradicts a statement that the data was excluded
Evidence (4)
“thuml/UTSD”
“Temperature Rain | 23.25M”
“All evaluated datasets are excluded from the pre-training dataset.”
“we experiment on GIFT-Eval (Aksu et al., 2024) and FEV leaderboard (Ansari et al., 2024)”
Seen, split unclear KDD Cup 2018 · the dataset was used; the source does not say which part (via Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD)); this contradicts a statement that the data was excluded
Evidence (4)
“thuml/UTSD”
“KDD Cup 2018 | 2.94M”
“All evaluated datasets are excluded from the pre-training dataset.”
“we experiment on GIFT-Eval (Aksu et al., 2024) and FEV leaderboard (Ansari et al., 2024)”
Not seen Car Parts · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Not seen ElectricityLoadDiagrams20112014 (UCI) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Long-horizon forecasting (ETT, Electricity, Traffic, Weather, Exchange, ILI)
Not seen ETTh1 · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Evidence (2)
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
“Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
Not seen ETTh2 · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Evidence (2)
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
“Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
Not seen ETTm1 · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Evidence (2)
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
“Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
Not seen ETTm2 · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Evidence (2)
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
“Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
Not seen Electricity (ECL, 321 clients) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Evidence (2)
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
“Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
Unknown Traffic (PeMS San Francisco Bay, 862 sensors) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Not seen Weather (Jena, 2020; Autoformer) · the authors state the dataset was excluded from training
Evidence (2)
“To prevent data leakage, we exclude all datasets evaluated in Section 5.1 to make sure that Sundial conducts zero-shot forecasting.”
“Zero-shot forecasting results of time series foundation models on long-term forecasting datasets (Time-Series-Library)”
Unknown Exchange-Rate · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown ILI (CDC influenza-like illness, national) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Time-series anomaly detection
Unknown TSB-AD-U (TSB-AD univariate) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown TSB-AD-M (TSB-AD multivariate) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown UCR Time Series Anomaly Archive (Hexagon ML/UCR, KDD Cup 2021) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Server Machine Dataset (SMD) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) telemetry anomaly dataset · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) telemetry anomaly dataset · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Pooled Server Metrics (PSM) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Secure Water Treatment (SWaT) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Yahoo S5 Labeled Anomaly Detection Dataset (Yahoo Webscope S5) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Time-series classification
Seen, split unclear UCR Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · the dataset was used; the source does not say which part (via Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD))
Evidence (5)
“thuml/UTSD”
“PigArtPressure | 0.62M”
“PigArtPressure | 0.62M”
“[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
“Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
Seen, split unclear UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification Archive (2018) · the dataset was used; the source does not say which part (via Unified Time Series Dataset (UTSD))
Evidence (5)
“thuml/UTSD”
“MotorImagery | 72.58M”
“MotorImagery | 72.58M”
“[3]: [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07758)”
“Each series representing a variate will be divided into training and validation splits at a ratio of 9:1 for pre-training.”
Notes
Paper describes Small/Base/Large sizes; only Base (128M) is released. Model card metadata lists datasets thuml/UTSD, Salesforce/lotsa_data, autogluon/chronos_datasets. In Sundial Table 1, Time-MoE's ECL and TimesFM's ECL/Weather cells are dashes (pre-training data). TimeBench includes LOTSA and the Chronos data; the authors state all evaluated datasets were excluded from it, so LOTSA is not linked directly.
Sources
- Sundial: A Family of Highly Capable Time Series Foundation Models (arXiv v4) · paper · retrieved 2026-10-15
- thuml/sundial-base-128m model card · model card · retrieved 2026-10-15
- thuml/Sundial README · readme · retrieved 2026-10-15
- GIFT-Eval results config for sundial_base_128m · leaderboard · retrieved 2026-10-15