Text / LLM / Model
Qwen2.5-VL
- Organisation
- Alibaba Cloud (Qwen Team)
- Family
- Qwen · version 2.5
- Released
- 2025-01-26 (Date of the Qwen2.5-VL announcement blog post, https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen2.5-vl/ (HF repos Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B/7B-Instruct created 2025-01-26))
- Checkpoints
- Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct, Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-32B-Instruct, Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct
- Weights
- Open · Apache 2.0 (per the 7B-Instruct model card; licenses of other sizes not checked)
- Links
- PaperModel cardCode
Training data disclosure: Vague
Level determined for 13% of benchmark cells.
- TestTest data seen2
- SeenSeen, split unclear0
- TrainTraining data seen0
- Related data seen1
- NoNot seen0
- ?Unknown19
“Compared to Qwen2-VL, we have significantly expanded the volume of our pre-training data, increasing it from 1.2 trillion tokens to approximately 4 trillion tokens.”
“Our pre-training dataset was constructed through a combination of methods, including cleaning raw web data, synthesizing data, etc.”
Built on
Everything these base models may have seen is inherited by Qwen2.5-VL.
Other declared training data
-
Vision encoder trained from scratch on DataComp and in-house datasets (broad web data: may contain benchmark test sets) · split: unknown
'DataComp' (Gadre et al., 2023) is not further specified (the pool or the filtered DataComp-1B subset); possibly related to corpus datacomp-1b. DataComp is a Common Crawl image-text scrape.
Evidence
“We trained a Vision Transformer (ViT) from scratch using DataComp (Gadre et al., 2023) and some in-house datasets as the initialization for the vision encoder”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.2.2 Training Recipe · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
raw web data (cleaned) and synthesized multimodal pre-training data (~4T tokens) (broad web data: may contain benchmark test sets) · split: unknown
Evidence
“Our pre-training dataset was constructed through a combination of methods, including cleaning raw web data, synthesizing data, etc.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.2.1 Pre-Training Data · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
multi-modal academic questions (pre-training data category) (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
Sources of the academic questions are not named.
Evidence
“such as image captions, interleaved image-text data, optical character recognition (OCR) data, visual knowledge (e.g., celebrity, landmark, flora, and fauna identification), multi-modal academic questions”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.2.1 Pre-Training Data · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
PixMo public pointing and counting data (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
Evidence
“the data source includes public pointing and counting data from PixMo (Deitke et al., 2024)”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.2.1 Grounding Data · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
1 million synthetic chart samples (matplotlib, seaborn, plotly) (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
Evidence
“For chart-type data, we synthesized 1 million samples using visualization libraries including matplotlib, seaborn, and plotly”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.2.1 OCR Data · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
SFT dataset (~2 million entries; queries from open-source repositories, purchased datasets and online query data) (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown · fine-tuning
Open-source instruction datasets are not named; whether training splits of ChartQA/DocVQA/AI2D etc. are included is not stated.
Evidence
“This dataset comprises approximately 2 million entries, evenly distributed between pure text data (50%) and multimodal data (50%)”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.3.1 Instruction Data · retrieved 2026-10-15 “The query sources are primarily drawn from open-source repositories, with additional contributions from curated purchased datasets and online query data.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.3.1 Instruction Data · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
rejection-sampling data from datasets with ground-truth annotations (math, code, domain-specific VQA) (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown · fine-tuning
Evidence
“The rejection sampling process begins with datasets enriched with ground truth annotations.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 2.3.3 Rejection Sampling · retrieved 2026-10-15
Benchmark cells
Classic LLM benchmarks
Unknown MMLU (Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding) · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
MATH (Mathematics Aptitude Test of Heuristics) · via base model Qwen2.5: a contamination analysis found test examples of the related dataset MATH-500 (Exact completion of 21.2% of MATH-500 problems from a 60% prefix (Table 2).) [third-party study]
Evidence (4)
“while leveraging the pre-trained Qwen2.5 large language model (LLM) (Yang et al., 2024a) as the initialization for the LLM component”
“revealing strong signs of data contamination in the Qwen2.5 series models when evaluated on commonly used benchmarks, such as MATH-500, AMC, and AIME2024.”
“We therefore evaluate our models only on the remaining 500 held-out problems. We selected these 500 test problems uniformly at random, and we believe they are representative of the test set as a whole.”
“This dataset contains a subset of 500 problems from the MATH benchmark that OpenAI created in their _Let's Verify Step by Step_ paper.”
Unknown HumanEval · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown ARC-Challenge (AI2 Reasoning Challenge, Challenge Set) · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown HellaSwag · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown TruthfulQA · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown WinoGrande · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Multimodal LLM benchmarks
Unknown MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning) · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown MMMU-Pro · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown MathVista · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown ChartQA · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown DocVQA · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown AI2D (AI2 Diagrams) · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown CharXiv · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Recent LLM benchmarks
Unknown GPQA Diamond · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown MMLU-Pro · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown LiveCodeBench (code generation, release_v6) · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown SWE-bench Verified · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Test data seen AIME 2024 · via base model Qwen2.5: a contamination analysis found test examples in the pre-training data (Exact completion of 13.33% of AIME 2024 problems from a 60% prefix (Table 2).) [third-party study]
Evidence (2)
“while leveraging the pre-trained Qwen2.5 large language model (LLM) (Yang et al., 2024a) as the initialization for the LLM component”
“revealing strong signs of data contamination in the Qwen2.5 series models when evaluated on commonly used benchmarks, such as MATH-500, AMC, and AIME2024.”
Unknown AIME 2025 · unknown for its base model Qwen2.5: training data not disclosed in enough detail
Test data seen MATH-500 · via base model Qwen2.5: a contamination analysis found test examples in the pre-training data (Exact completion of 21.2% of MATH-500 problems from a 60% prefix (Table 2).) [third-party study]
Evidence (2)
“while leveraging the pre-trained Qwen2.5 large language model (LLM) (Yang et al., 2024a) as the initialization for the LLM component”
“revealing strong signs of data contamination in the Qwen2.5 series models when evaluated on commonly used benchmarks, such as MATH-500, AMC, and AIME2024.”
Notes
No benchmark is named as training data and no decontamination statement against multimodal benchmarks was found in the report. Training-data description is by category only. Accepts images and videos (model card: 'it is highly capable of analyzing texts, charts, icons, graphics, and layouts within images'). Accepts image input: “it is highly capable of analyzing texts, charts, icons, graphics, and layouts within images”
Sources
- Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report (arXiv 2502.13923v1) · paper · retrieved 2026-10-15
- Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct model card · model card · retrieved 2026-10-15
- Qwen2.5 VL! blog post (2025-01-26) · website · retrieved 2026-10-15