Text / LLM / Model

Phi-4

Organisation
Microsoft
Family
Phi · version 4
Released
2024-12-12 (Model card 'Release date: December 12, 2024', https://huggingface.co/microsoft/phi-4; arXiv v1 2024-12-12)
Training cutoff
2024-06-01
Evidence
“Static model trained on an offline dataset with cutoff dates of June 2024 and earlier for publicly available data”
huggingface.co · model card · Model Summary / Status · retrieved 2026-10-15
Checkpoints
microsoft/phi-4
Weights
Open · MIT
Links

Training data disclosure: Vague

Level determined for 60% of benchmark cells.

“Table 5: Data mixture for pretraining.”
arxiv.org · paper · Table 5 (Web 15%, Web rewrites 15%, Synthetic 40%, Code data 20%, Acquired sources 10%) · retrieved 2026-10-15
“`phi-4` is a state-of-the-art open model built upon a blend of synthetic datasets, data from filtered public domain websites, and acquired academic books and Q&A datasets.”
huggingface.co · model card · Model Summary · retrieved 2026-10-15

Other declared training data

Declared exclusions

Benchmark cells

Classic LLM benchmarks

Not seen MMLU (Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding) · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Not seen GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Not seen MATH (Mathematics Aptitude Test of Heuristics) · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Not seen HumanEval · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Not seen ARC-Challenge (AI2 Reasoning Challenge, Challenge Set) · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Not seen HellaSwag · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Unknown TruthfulQA · training data not disclosed in enough detail

Not seen WinoGrande · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Recent LLM benchmarks

Unknown GPQA Diamond · training data not disclosed in enough detail

Not seen MMLU-Pro · the authors state its test portion was excluded from training

Evidence (3)
“We decontaminate against the ARC-Easy, MBPP, phibench, CommonsenseQA, WinoGrande, mcphi, MedQA, MATH, AGIEval, PIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, GPQA, mt-bench, MMLUPro, GSM8k, HumanEval, arena hard, ARC-Challenge, and MMLU benchmarks.”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“We apply a hybrid n-gram algorithm for decontamination which uses 13-gram and 7-gram features for removing matches to the test set”
arxiv.org · paper · Appendix B.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
“these methods are not effective against all scenarios, including rephrasing, which leaves some uncertainty about the true extent of generalization.”
arxiv.org · paper · Section 5 (limitations of benchmarks) · retrieved 2026-10-15

Unknown LiveCodeBench (code generation, release_v6) · training data not disclosed in enough detail

Unknown SWE-bench Verified · training data not disclosed in enough detail

Unknown AIME 2024 · training data not disclosed in enough detail

Not seen AIME 2025 · its test items were published from 2025-02-06, after the model's stated training-data cutoff (2024-06-01)

Evidence (3)
“Static model trained on an offline dataset with cutoff dates of June 2024 and earlier for publicly available data”
huggingface.co · model card · Model Summary / Status · retrieved 2026-10-15
“2025 AIME I problems and solutions. The test was held on Thursday, February 6, 2025.”
web.archive.org · website · retrieved 2026-10-15
“This year the AIME I will take place on February 6, 2025, while the alternate AIME II will take place on February 12, 2025.”
maa.org · website · retrieved 2026-10-15

Unknown MATH-500 · training data not disclosed in enough detail

Notes

~10T pre-training tokens (card: 9.8T). Report Section 1.1 'Addressing Overfitting and Data Contamination': decontamination improved vs previous Phi models; strong November 2024 AMC-10/12 results are presented as evidence that 'phi-4’s top-tier performance on the MATH benchmark is not due to overfitting or contamination'; GPQA weighted as 'contamination-proof'. Footnote: 'some test benchmark variants can be found on platforms like Hugging Face' and MMLU is 'frequently compiled from web-sourced questions'. TruthfulQA is not in the decontamination list. Decontamination statements not shown as cells (they name no benchmark tracked here, or none at all): AMC-10 / AMC-12, November 2024. Accepts image input: “Inputs | Text, best suited for prompts in the chat format”

Sources