Text / LLM / Model
Claude Mythos Preview
- Organisation
- Anthropic
- Family
- Claude
- Released
- 2026-04-07 (Date of the Claude Mythos Preview System Card ('April 7, 2026'); limited release to partners (Project Glasswing))
- Training cutoff
- 2026-02-01
Evidence
“some data being acquired/collected up to February 2026.”
aial.ie · website · Section 1.3 (Latest date of data acquisition) · retrieved 2026-10-15 - Weights
- Closed · proprietary
- Links
- Model card
Training data disclosure: Partial list
Level determined for 18% of benchmark cells.
- TestTest data seen3
- SeenSeen, split unclear0
- TrainTraining data seen0
- Related data seen1
- NoNot seen0
- ?Unknown18
“Claude Mythos Preview was trained on a proprietary mix of publicly available information from the internet, public and private datasets”
“The training corpus is derived from several publicly accessible repositories, notably including Common Crawl, a repository of web crawl data, as well as specialized datasets available through platforms like GitHub and HuggingFace.”
Other declared training data
-
Common Crawl (broad web data: may contain benchmark test sets) · split: unknown
Evidence
“The training corpus is derived from several publicly accessible repositories, notably including Common Crawl, a repository of web crawl data, as well as specialized datasets available through platforms like GitHub and HuggingFace.”
aial.ie · website · Section 2.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
specialized datasets available through platforms like GitHub and HuggingFace (broad web data: may contain benchmark test sets) · split: unknown
Evidence
“The training corpus is derived from several publicly accessible repositories, notably including Common Crawl, a repository of web crawl data, as well as specialized datasets available through platforms like GitHub and HuggingFace.”
aial.ie · website · Section 2.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
publicly available information from the internet (broad web data: may contain benchmark test sets) · split: unknown
Evidence
“Claude Mythos Preview was trained on a proprietary mix of publicly available information from the internet, public and private datasets”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 1.1.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
public and private datasets (not yet matched to a dataset) · split: unknown
Evidence
“Claude Mythos Preview was trained on a proprietary mix of publicly available information from the internet, public and private datasets”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 1.1.1 · retrieved 2026-10-15
Declared exclusions
-
Dataset CharXiv · test portion excluded
Evidence
“Despite robust image-level filtering of evaluation images, we confirm that the majority of question-answer text pairs appear in the corpus.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.2.2 (CharXiv Reasoning) · retrieved 2026-10-15
Contamination analyses
Analyses that found benchmark test data in this model's training data, or in a corpus it uses.
-
SWE-bench Verified
· training data
Developer memorisation audit found some signs of memorisation on SWE-bench Verified, Multilingual and Pro despite corpus-level decontamination; a high-recall filter (threshold 0.7) removes 8-15% of each benchmark
Evidence
“We apply corpus-level decontamination, but we still observe some signs of memorization in all three benchmarks.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.2.1 (SWE-bench evaluations) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “This is consistent with Claude Mythos Preview having memorized some of the more difficult flagged problems, which the baseline models did not independently solve.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Figure 6.2.1.A caption · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
CharXiv
· pre-training data
The developer found the majority of CharXiv Reasoning question-answer text pairs in the full pretraining mix by exact-match search, even though evaluation images were filtered at image level. The evaluated items are 1,000 validation-split questions. On a 100-item manually perturbed remix, the developer judged memorisation effects limited.
Evidence
“We select evaluation items with distinctive answer text and grep the full pretraining mix for exact matches, and separately search for evaluation images.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.2.2 (CharXiv Reasoning) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Despite robust image-level filtering of evaluation images, we confirm that the majority of question-answer text pairs appear in the corpus.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.2.2 (CharXiv Reasoning) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “We evaluate the model on 1,000 questions from the validation split and average scores over five runs.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.11.3 (CharXiv Reasoning) · retrieved 2026-10-15 -
MMMU-Pro
· training data
A large fraction of MMMU-Pro images were found in the training data, mainly via textbooks, homework-help sites and document crawls. The developer omitted MMMU-Pro results from the system card.
Evidence
“We identified a large fraction of MMMU-Pro images that appear in the training data, primarily via textbooks, homework-help sites, and document crawls, which repackage and distribute the underlying source content.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.2.3 (MMMU-Pro) · retrieved 2026-10-15 “Given the difficulty of determining the impact of contamination, we choose to omit results for MMMU-Pro from this System Card.”
www-cdn.anthropic.com · model card · Section 6.2.3 (MMMU-Pro) · retrieved 2026-10-15
Benchmark cells
Classic LLM benchmarks
Unknown MMLU (Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown MATH (Mathematics Aptitude Test of Heuristics) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown HumanEval · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown ARC-Challenge (AI2 Reasoning Challenge, Challenge Set) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown HellaSwag · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown TruthfulQA · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown WinoGrande · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Multimodal LLM benchmarks
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning) · a contamination analysis found test examples of the related dataset MMMU-Pro (A large fraction of MMMU-Pro images were found in the training data, mainly via textbooks, homework-help sites and document crawls. The developer omitted MMMU-Pro results from the system card.)
Evidence (5)
“We identified a large fraction of MMMU-Pro images that appear in the training data, primarily via textbooks, homework-help sites, and document crawls, which repackage and distribute the underlying source content.”
“Given the difficulty of determining the impact of contamination, we choose to omit results for MMMU-Pro from this System Card.”
“we introduce MMMU-Pro, a more robust and challenging version of the MMMU benchmark.”
“Given that the 577 questions in MMMU-Pro are sourced from the MMMU validation set”
“It builds upon the original MMMU benchmark by introducing several key improvements that make it more challenging and realistic”
Test data seen MMMU-Pro · a contamination analysis found test examples in the training data (A large fraction of MMMU-Pro images were found in the training data, mainly via textbooks, homework-help sites and document crawls. The developer omitted MMMU-Pro results from the system card.)
Evidence (2)
“We identified a large fraction of MMMU-Pro images that appear in the training data, primarily via textbooks, homework-help sites, and document crawls, which repackage and distribute the underlying source content.”
“Given the difficulty of determining the impact of contamination, we choose to omit results for MMMU-Pro from this System Card.”
Unknown MathVista · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown ChartQA · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown DocVQA · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown AI2D (AI2 Diagrams) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Test data seen CharXiv · a contamination analysis found test examples in the pre-training data (The developer found the majority of CharXiv Reasoning question-answer text pairs in the full pretraining mix by exact-match search, even though evaluation images were filtered at image level. The evaluated items are 1,000 validation-split questions. On a 100-item manually perturbed remix, the developer judged memorisation effects limited.); this contradicts a statement that the data was excluded
Evidence (4)
“We select evaluation items with distinctive answer text and grep the full pretraining mix for exact matches, and separately search for evaluation images.”
“Despite robust image-level filtering of evaluation images, we confirm that the majority of question-answer text pairs appear in the corpus.”
“We evaluate the model on 1,000 questions from the validation split and average scores over five runs.”
“Despite robust image-level filtering of evaluation images, we confirm that the majority of question-answer text pairs appear in the corpus.”
Recent LLM benchmarks
Unknown GPQA Diamond · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown MMLU-Pro · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown LiveCodeBench (code generation, release_v6) · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Test data seen SWE-bench Verified · a contamination analysis found test examples in the training data (Developer memorisation audit found some signs of memorisation on SWE-bench Verified, Multilingual and Pro despite corpus-level decontamination; a high-recall filter (threshold 0.7) removes 8-15% of each benchmark)
Evidence (2)
“We apply corpus-level decontamination, but we still observe some signs of memorization in all three benchmarks.”
“This is consistent with Claude Mythos Preview having memorized some of the more difficult flagged problems, which the baseline models did not independently solve.”
Unknown AIME 2024 · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown AIME 2025 · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Unknown MATH-500 · training data not disclosed in enough detail
Notes
Included because its system card has the most detailed Anthropic contamination analysis (Section 6.2), which the Claude 5 system cards cite for SWE-bench memorisation screening. Decontamination follows the Claude Opus 4.5 methodology plus perceptual-hash removal of training images matching multimodal evaluation images ('We take several steps to decontaminate our evaluations; see Section 2.2 of the Claude Opus 4.5 System Card'). No API model ID or stated knowledge cutoff; training_cutoff is the EU summary's latest data acquisition date. EU summary is an AIAL-hosted copy of Anthropic's document (Anthropic's trust portal is not fetchable). Accepts image input: “Claude Mythos Preview can understand both text and image inputs, engaging in conversation, analysis, coding, and creative tasks.” Exclusion not shown as a cell (names no tracked benchmark): images contained in multimodal evaluations (perceptual-hash match).
Sources
- System Card: Claude Mythos Preview · model card · retrieved 2026-10-15
- Public Summary of Training Content: Claude Mythos Preview (Anthropic; copy archived by AIAL, 2026-08-03) · website · retrieved 2026-10-15
- Anthropic Transparency Hub: Model Report · website · retrieved 2026-10-15